- A
Posted by Asa Dotzler at October 21, 2005 10:36 AMWell, with this link I get two more bugs:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&resolution=EXPIRED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailtype2=exact&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=attachments.ispatch&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=1
Not sure what the difference is.
Expired bug == unconfirmed bug + spam?
It sure looks like it.
The difference is bug 240710 and bug 271164: Asa filtered out bugs with obsolete patches.
In these cases it worked, but I'm not sure I trust what his query would do if a bug had both an obsolete and non-obsolete patch.
Posted by Dan Veditz at October 21, 2005 12:03 PMOK. So we _can_ query on this. Good! Now who's up for looking at those bugs?
Posted by Boris at October 21, 2005 12:46 PMSurely we should be asking: who created a patch for a bug without confirming it first?
Hmmm, OK, so a lot of the bugs have patches from the reporter, and maybe they don't have canconfirm. Fair enough.
I'll look through a few of the bugs.
Yes, we're talking about patches from reporters.
Posted by Boris at October 21, 2005 4:10 PMWell, I reopened a few of those bugs, cc-ed reviewers on one of the bugs -> no response thus far after 4 days.
Not really encouraging.
And with most of the bug list, I don't now what it's about, so I'd rather not meddle with it.
Ccing reviewers is probably nearly useless... Unless you mean you set some review? flags on the relevant people?
Posted by Boris at October 26, 2005 7:44 AMNo, the review flags were already set, so I cc-ed the reviewers in hope of an answer (that's at least what I can recall of it).
Anyway, the previous bugzilla query I gave is slightly wrong, since it doesn't filter out the obsolete patches, this is a more correct query:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&resolution=EXPIRED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailtype2=exact&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=attachments.ispatch&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=1&negate1=1&field1-0-0=attachments.isobsolete&type1-0-0=equals&value1-0-0=1