"The ratio was much worse with the first round."
That's the idea! :-) Note that I excluded the Layout components this time, as requested. So you should have got a lot less bugspam this time.
Can't you filter the UNCO mails out using Thunderbird to search for particular body text?
Posted by Gerv at October 14, 2005 3:16 AMI've been reading bugs that I get auto-resolve email for, because if I've cc'ed myself on an UNCO bug, that usually means I care about the bug in some way. I imagine it's the same for bz.
Posted by Jesse Ruderman at October 14, 2005 3:48 AM> So you should have got a lot less bugspam this
> time.
I did. Last time I completely filtered out all the actual comments from you, and I still ended up with a few days' worth of extra bugmail to sort through.
> to search for particular body text?
There's no useful text to search for in that body, gerv. You didn't put in any sort of unique string. Searching on "|EXPIRED" gave me some existing mails as well (this is IMAP, with lots of existing bugmail in the folder) that had that string in the body. Which means that even if I stick all those off into a separate folder (and I have), there's no guarantee that real new stuff didn't get caught in that search.
The situation is even worse with replies to the resolution mail (5 or 6 bugs so far, with an average of 2 comments each from the reporter as they reopen the bug). Those I do have to read.
And frankly, given the 2/7 ratio, it seems that I should really read these. If that holds, there are 100-some real bugs involved here.
Posted by Boris at October 14, 2005 7:56 AM