"I must say that the lack of an ID on the waterfall table is mightily annoying!"
I must say that the lack of a bug on this issue so it can be fixed is mightily annoying!
Posted by reed at January 27, 2009 7:34 PMReed, I was sure there was a bug on it. It's been a known issue for years, and tinderbox bugs don't exactly get fixed with alacrity... In any case, filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475659 for your delectation.
Posted by Boris at January 27, 2009 10:44 PMThere's a lot of problems in the mozilla source base that are "known". "Known to whom?" is the real question.
The first bookmarklet sounds like it would be useful for solving bug 381104. I had a basic implementation using CSS but it never worked quite right.
Posted by cls at January 28, 2009 12:42 AMIt doesn't quite fix bug 381104, sadly. I couldn't figure out a way to do that, in fact. What it lets you do is scroll down the waterfall without losing track of which column corresponds to which build.
Posted by Boris at January 28, 2009 8:45 AMIsn't it always the case that problems are occurring when working with several programs? Hope you'll get lots of them fixed.
Posted by Michael at March 16, 2009 9:58 AM