Wow :-) So there's more than one way to skin a cat. (Actually, there are 50 ways, some of them hilarious, but that's not important right now.)
Suggestions so far include:
But the winner is:
There's no indication that you can do this, but it does work. Select the entry and press Ctrl-C. It works in both Firefox and the Mozilla Suite without even changing the JavaScript settings. Congratulations to Irongut :-)
Posted by gerv at October 8, 2004 9:39 AMMy son Hedley put me onto your web browser and I find it great. The way it treats graphics and download beats all the others I have tried so far.
Keep it up and I will stay (and pay) with you.
My only 'bitch' is that like all other software you think that everyone lives in the USA!
And, OK, the URL I supplied is my winter home. (I can't stand the UK winters) and we also rent it out, but that was not why I put it there!
Posted by: Martin Thorne at October 8, 2004 5:28 PMInterestingly enough, while you can copy the address of the image from the media tab using Ctrl+C, you can't copy it using Ctrl+Insert (in Linux w/Firefox 20040927). Perhaps a bug? I've never run into anyone else that actually uses that combination, but it's all I've ever used for copying - along with Shift+Delete for cut, and Shift+Insert for paste... and I use those shortcuts in nearly every program (in both Windows and Linux). I can also use those shortcuts elsewhere in Firefox, just not there.
Posted by: CatamountJack at October 8, 2004 5:50 PMHow about just adding the "clear.gif" file to the blacklist in AdBlock. With that out of the way, you can just right click and "Save Background As". DONE!
Posted by: BlackLight at October 8, 2004 5:54 PMAm I missing something, or can't I just fetch the image from the browser cache?
Posted by: Robert at October 8, 2004 6:17 PMBlacklight: that might work, as long as the image being blocked didn't shrink the <img> tag (and therefore the surrounding <div>.
Posted by: Gerv at October 8, 2004 6:17 PMGery: Good point. I think AdBlock's default settings are to not "Collapse Blocked Elements" by default (that's definitely how I like mine). It's certainly a configurable value.
Posted by: BlackLight at October 8, 2004 6:30 PMFor those who don't know their Mozilla-based browser intimately, the Media tab is in the Tools -> Page Info window.
Posted by: Richard Soderberg at October 8, 2004 9:40 PMBig deal.
1. Mouse gesture (diagonal: north-west) over clear gif
2. Right click, save background image
or
1. Adblock image
2. userContent.css plus uri-id extension (make .theimg have a fixed size so you can actually click it)
or
1. View source
2. Find: '.theimg'
3. Copy background:url(...)
or
1. Get the EditCSS extension
2. Block the clear gif
3. Edit CSS, give .theimg a width and height
4. Right-click, Save Background As...
I copied the image location from the URL in the media tab, pasted into the address bar and hey presto.
Posted by: CJ at October 9, 2004 1:21 AMThis is the most basic system to crack that I have come across. Just add this very simple CSS to your userContent.css, or the Edit CSS sidebar that comes with Web Developer toolbar.
img[src="images/cleardot.gif"] { visibility: hidden; }
Then just do View Background image and save. It couldn’t be simpler.
Personally, I don't like this Google Print protection system, it's just pointless. The only feature that I have found that actually protects the copyright is that the user is limited to the number of pages that can be viewed, but I don’t think it will take long for someone to find a way around that. If you publish something on the internet like this, and someone wants it bad enough, there is nothing that can be done to prevent someone copying it. Google should be smart enough to realise that and just give up on all these ridiculous copyright features. They also reducce accessibility since there is no alt text for the pages, but that’s hardly surprising considering the awful state of the rest of their site.
Posted by: Lachlan Hunt at October 9, 2004 5:14 AMThis is to reassure idiotic book publishers.
Who said anything about fool-proof DRM? ;)
Posted by: Zoomer at October 9, 2004 5:58 AMA publisher may not submit his/her FDL-licensed book into Google Print. Violates the license.
Posted by: phrostypoison at October 9, 2004 7:39 AMPersonally, I don't like this Google Print protection system, it's just pointless.
Not at all. It stops 99.99% of people from saving book images to disk.
phrostypoison: that's not necessarily true, for several reasons. Firstly, the copyright owner can do anything they like with their book. Secondly, Google may have the ability to turn off the protection on a per-book basis. Thirdly, does this count as real DRM? I don't think so - it's security through obscurity. As I said in earlier posts, it's a clue barrier.
Posted by: Gerv at October 9, 2004 2:22 PMhttp://www.google.com/search?q=+the
Posted by: hacker at October 9, 2004 9:25 PMMay I suggest that the excellent Kleptomania (http://www.structurise.com/kleptomania/) and ScreenOCR (http://www.screenocr.com/) applications might be of interest? ;)
Posted by: Marcus Tucker at October 11, 2004 10:58 AMhad some free time, so here it is: the special purpose bookmarklet to extract "theimg"
Posted by: Michael Buerge at October 12, 2004 12:06 AM