« The Crazy French | Main | Beware the Marquee Cube »

July 29, 2003

Return of the Browser Wars?

eweek has an article about how Mozilla is now free and can take on IE. I disagree about Netscape holding back mozilla, it was never user end-user friendly. Go to IRC and ask a question, you get sent by someone to #mozillazine. And lets not forget the non-stellar QA for releases (1.2.1 anyone?). Also, Mozilla.org didn't seperate itself from Netscape, Netscape was finally killed, they had no choice. AOL gets 2 million dollars in writeoffs and doesn't get a bad name as the Mozilla killer. They only killed Netscape, and we never did anything for the project anyways, just held it back!

The article however does make a very good point about first concentrating on buisnesses:

"Netscape initially became big because everyone used it at work and then decided to use it at home."

And Gecko is in pretty good shape - strong DOM support for building advanced web applications, the best CSS support for creating an application that looks like a native application, XML/XSLT support to over modularity and Web Services support to get and send data without having to reload the page.

And look at the main backers - IBM, Sun, Redhat. Web applications are cross-platform, as Gecko is available on lots of platforms.

However, if Firebird is to be fast, should it still use XUL? Redhat could easily use Epiphany, which is a native gtk2 app embedding Gecko in a simple UI. Its faster than Firebird and fits with the rest of the Gnome desktop.

But, do enterprises want a small browser or an application suite that does all their communications needs? I would say some want a suite, some a standalone.

Posted by doron at July 29, 2003 10:56 AM

Comments

they can download all of them components separately can't they?

Posted by: h at July 29, 2003 11:06 AM

What other good browsers is on Windows?

Opera too confusing

Posted by: Joe at July 29, 2003 11:13 AM

I don't see many corporates looking for a suite at this point, depending on their current infrastructure. Outlook/Exchange and Lotus Notes are fairly pervasive in those markets, and that's a lot of client/server stuff. Mozilla on the other hand is a client only at this point, and unless IBM is going to have a Mozilla-based Notes client for non-Windows OS (which would be an idea...) then I don't see a foothold into that market.

If the GRE stuff really happens, then Firebird will be a lot faster, and Mail/Calendar would gain a lot of speed as well, making it a good foothold into the low end of the suite market.

Posted by: Mike at July 29, 2003 4:28 PM

To get into companies, Mozilla needed a way to customize it easily for several hundreds of users. Something like CCK for Netscape.

Posted by: daniel. at July 30, 2003 12:05 AM

You Must Promise. To call your mother, to help old ladies cross the road, and to turn your cell phone off at the movies.

Posted by: Ellis at January 26, 2004 10:27 AM

Don't give up, you are close.

Posted by: Eakin Beth at February 27, 2004 11:58 AM