Wireles LAN sucks. I've been trying the D-Link DI-624+ for about a month now and I've decided to return it. It just doesn't work as advertised. Maybe it's D-Link that sucks, or it's because wireless LAN sucks in general.
The device is supposed to handle 54 Mbps theoretically, which, according to most people, translates to roughly 27 Mbps of actual data transfer, which is what I get when transferring data over the local network. That alone is enough for WLAN to suck, since you can never achieve the advertised bitrate of 54 Mbps. But there's more...
My Internet connection has a maximum download speed of 8 Mbps. When using a standard network cable, I get exactly that as my maximum download rate (e.g. 1 MB/sec). However, when using the wireless network, I only get around 2-4 Mbps! In other words, the WLAN becomes the bottleneck and not the ISP, despite the fact that the WLAN handles bitrates much higher than 8 Mbps within the local network!
The bottom line: WLAN sucks. Or I suck. Either way, I'm going back to cables.
Posted by djst at January 6, 2005 12:38 AMYes, David, WLAN sucks because you can't use it properly, or you have faulty kit.
I have had problems with Mozilla installing before. Do I then say Mozilla sucks? No.
Try returning it, and also check your signal strength. Something is obviously up if you are getting 1/10 of what you should have.
Posted by: Martin Alderson at January 6, 2005 1:09 AMMy signal strength is "Excellent". And I didn't say WLAN sucks, I said: "WLAN sucks. Or I suck." :)
Posted by: David Tenser at January 6, 2005 1:23 AMD-Link totally sucks. I had one and returned it because it didn't work.
I now have a Linksys and it works flawlessly.
Trust me, it's D-Link's fault, it and their firmware sucks so hard.
I got a nice Linksys now, thank god.
Posted by: Tom Sommer at January 6, 2005 2:41 AMI have had several experiences with D-Link over the past couple of years, and they have always been positive. I even run a DLink router at home - with no difficulty, WLAN or otherwise... But maybe my experiences are just different than others'.
It is entirely possible that your router is horked, however... A replacement model could never hurt :-)
Posted by: John at January 6, 2005 2:49 AMyou only get 27mbps on a 54mbps link because 802.11b/g is half duplex.
everyone who's anyone uses cables where they can, for reasons just like this.
Posted by: jeremiah at January 6, 2005 2:54 AMI use a Linksys, without problems at all.
Anyone know where I can get a WLAN cable? ;-D
Posted by: ChrisI at January 6, 2005 6:33 AMMy experiences with DLink hardware have been almost unilaterally negative. Ditch it and go with Linksys instead, their stuff is much more reliable.
Posted by: Rod at January 6, 2005 8:32 AMIt's not you that sucks, it's D-Link. Worst networking products ever made.
Linksys, Netgear, Buffalo, even Microsoft make fine wireless hardware.
Posted by: Seth Kinast at January 6, 2005 8:32 AMI have only D-Link here at the office. Not a single problem, speed is excellent.
Posted by: Daniel Glazman at January 6, 2005 9:28 AMSome hypes are nonsense, but a completly portable laptop throughout my unversity downloading with +/- 3MB/s using my Atheros card (built in a IBM Thinkpad) is bliss. So I'm sorry for your bad experience.
Posted by: Bram at January 6, 2005 12:26 PMI've set up a few Linksys WLANs, and all of them have worked well for me. I haven't tried a D-Link WLAN, but I have a D-Link wired router here, and it's pretty mediocre. The D-Link firmware seems to have more features than Linksys, but I don't think it's as stable.
Posted by: Ali Ebrahim at January 6, 2005 3:04 PMSomethings that you might wanna make sure off:
1)Get the DI624+ Rev C. It only has one antenna, but it's the only revision that actually works.
2)Make sure the Super-G Mode is turned off. It allows the router to be more stable.
I've had mine for a few months now, works great.
Posted by: Jasmeet at January 6, 2005 3:26 PM27Mbps is good for a typical 802.11g setup. I have no idea why the wireless slows done for wan vs lan use but I can only assume something is screwy with your setup or the wap. The fact that it gets good speed over local is odd. I suggest a full hard reset of the wap and then buying another brand if possible.
Your still somewhat luckier than I am though, I only get 2MB max over my free Verizon wap. 27Mbps would be a treat.
My D-Link DI-624+ Rev. C is less than ideal. Even with all the fancy features turned off it still crashes on a fairly regular basis. I've also had issues with it occasionally deciding to not connect from the LAN to the internet until I've manually power-cycled it.
I hear other wireless routers can be better, though.
Posted by: David at January 6, 2005 11:07 PMI've had both Linksys and Netgear. I have several friends who went with D-Link.
The only one I can actually recommend is Netgear. Very powerful equipment. Good signal, good processing power (important if yours is also a firewall and there's a virus looking for open ports).
The linksys proved to be cheap POS. Unstable, slower, not great signal quality... you get exactly what you pay for.
D-Link has just proved all around to be good marketing. It's an average quality product. They just have great product placement in stores.
Posted by: Robert Accettura at January 9, 2005 4:09 AM