I've placed an experimental build of mozilla seamonkey for WIN32 with the new DNS code here:
http://friedfish.homeip.net/builds/dns/mozilla-dns-win32-20030718.zip
http://friedfish.homeip.net/builds/dns/mozilla-dns-linux-rh9-20030716.tar.bz2
http://friedfish.homeip.net/builds/dns/mozilla-dns-linux-rh7-20030716.tar.bz2
(Here's the patch used to generate these builds.)
It's not the fastest line, but it should do the trick. If you have cycles to test out these bits, that'd be great. Please let me know if you find any bugs. Thanks!
Posted by darin at July 14, 2003 8:16 PMDarin, Is there any specific URL access pattern you want testers to try. I have been playing with your build for an hour or so on Windows 2K and its good so far
Posted by: Yusuf at July 14, 2003 9:47 PMYusuf,
Good question... it's probably a good idea to focus on loading pages that load frames and images from many different domains, and try pressing STOP during page load. also, try going offline while a page is loading, or try shutting down the browser while a page is loading.
Posted by: Darin Fisher at July 15, 2003 12:35 AMThanks for the build, it's working well so far on Win2k (IPv4), I'll test it tomorrow for IPv6.
Posted by: wolruf at July 15, 2003 12:37 AMI'm not the most vigorous surfer, but I've not had problems: win98SE
-R
Posted by: Ran at July 15, 2003 10:48 AMWell, actually, I just visited http://www.theregister.co.uk/ and pressed the on/offline toggle icon during load. From then on, the app seemed to have trouble determining if it was on or off line. I could not get a reload unless I pressed shift+reload. When it began to reload, I toggled again. After that, I could not get a reload regardless, only a busy cursor.
-R
Posted by: Ran at July 15, 2003 10:59 AMThanks for the feedback Ran. I'll see if I can't repro that problem.
Posted by: Darin Fisher at July 16, 2003 10:11 AMthe RH9 wfm on Mandrake 9.1 + IPv4: browsing seems a little faster (simultaneous DNS req ?), no issue when switching off VPN connection while Mozilla was active (no need to go offline/online), Mozilla didn't hang at exit after switching DNS with VPN neither. Nice build so far.
Posted by: wolruf at July 16, 2003 3:53 PMMore...
Toggling to offline during page-load *then pressing stop* seems to be the real show-stopper. As a matter of fact, after doing so, I cannot reload the page either by pressing the bookmark on the toolbar or by going back and forward -- just busy cursor. And the statusbar gives no indication of attempting to connect or resolving host.
-R
Posted by: Ran at July 17, 2003 12:11 AMFurthermore...
The toggle online/offline icon and the Work Offline menu item appear to get out of synch when you toggle back online with the icon. Probably strictly a chrome issue, but thought I'd mention it.
-R
Posted by: Ran at July 17, 2003 8:15 AMI'm 100% behind your idea with the
Personal Toolbar. It's very much
the same kind of simplification as
when we got rid of the Bookmark
Group bookmarks with just making every
folder a potential group.
For my Paint application, I created a series of icons to simulate a rendering algorithm. While the application is performing this CPU-intensive task, you can always see the status of the document by the icon changing in the Dock.
Posted by: Venetia at January 24, 2004 12:30 PMHelp! Did you include help tags in your applications? (I'd be lost without them.) Also, be sure to take extra time to develop your other help files. The Apple Help Viewer supports HTML, QuickTime, and also AppleScript. Take advantage of it! There isn't anything I hate more than going to the Help menu and finding there isn't any help.
Posted by: Edwin at January 24, 2004 12:30 PMDock Animation. Sometimes animating icons in the dock can be useful in communicating the status of the system or application.
Posted by: Didimus at January 24, 2004 12:30 PMSo far in these articles, I have only dipped a toe or two into Aqua's pool. I have covered basic aspects of building an Aqua-compliant application, including the building of photo-illustrative/3D application icons. Now it's time to address other components of our Mac OS X application.
Posted by: Ninion at January 24, 2004 12:30 PMIn building your amazing Aqua application, one of the most important things to consider is the Dock. There are three things your app needs to be "Dock Compliant." Now, I write this knowing that the Dock will be going through some major changes soon, but for the most part, these should still hold true.
Posted by: Janikin at January 24, 2004 12:30 PMYou Must Promise. To call your mother, to help old ladies cross the road, and to turn your cell phone off at the movies.
Posted by: Stephen at January 24, 2004 12:30 PMTo put my money where my mouth is, in each new article I'll build a hypothetical application that illustrates the guidelines I'm covering. Today's application is called "Paint" and will be based on the photo-illustrative icon I created in my last article. Together we will complete each step, and by the end of the project we should have a well-designed, 95%-100% Aqua-compliant application. I'll leave some room for personal preferences and the fact that Apple changes the OS every few months.
Posted by: Agnes at January 24, 2004 12:30 PMIf an application is designed well, the reward for users is that they will learn it faster, accomplish their daily tasks more easily, and have fewer questions for the help desk. As a developer of a well-designed application, your returns on that investment are more upgrade revenue, reduced tech support, better reviews, less documentation, and higher customer satisfaction. The rewards of building a good-looking Aqua application are worth taking the extra time.
Posted by: Gartheride at January 24, 2004 12:30 PMSo far in these articles, I have only dipped a toe or two into Aqua's pool. I have covered basic aspects of building an Aqua-compliant application, including the building of photo-illustrative/3D application icons. Now it's time to address other components of our Mac OS X application.
Posted by: Thadeus at January 24, 2004 12:30 PMUser Assistance. This is helping the user with the proper "next step" when performing a task. Less guesswork for the user on what to do next makes for a better experience.
Posted by: Owen at January 24, 2004 12:31 PMSome nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Posted by: Scheller Nicole at January 25, 2004 7:12 AMHello, I just wanted to say you have a very informative site which really made me think, thanks very much! Have a nice Day!!
Gambling Online
Posted by: Gambling Online at February 13, 2004 4:44 AMI did a search in the search engines on a "professional blog" and I found your web blog. I am a Lawyer in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada and thus my interest in searching for a lawyer blog on the WWW looking to see how the rest of the world thinks about lawyers and see what trends and technology are happening in the world. I also was interested in a blog for myself which might possibly lead to a blob for my law firm, you never know, that is if I can understand the technology of operating a blog and from what I see I am somewhat hesitant at the present time.
You have perked my senses with very interesting reading but I will keep my professional comments to myself.
Respectfully yours
B. J. Stephens, LL.B. A Halifax Lawyer