Status update
Now that we finally got 0.3a1 out the door, several of the bugs that had patches pending were able to land. These, and other fixes since the release are now included in the latest nightly builds:
- Bug 298348 - Make Lightning localizable
- Bug 307749 - Don't build the .xpi when building Sunbird
- Bug 315137 - Fix for hard-coded string in calendarProperties.xul
- Bug 313660 - Fix for Javascript Strict Warning in unifinderToDo.js
- Bug 314345 - Events and tasks still seen if all calendars is deselected
- Bug 314934 - Ctrl+z/Ctrl+Y don't work for undo/redo
- Bug 315916 - Alarm popups entity error
- Bug 220694 - Show item's location in the alarm dialog
- Bug 315908 - Cannot change alarm values for a task
- Bug 315930 - 'Publish Entire Calendar' does not publish tasks
- Bug 267160 - 'Visit URL' button doesn't work in sunbird
- Bug 315373 - Help -> Release notes is greyed out
- Bug 315492 - Localization cleanup
Comments
Will there be a release for Thunderbird 1.5 when it is released, or does TB 1.5 live on another branch than Sunbird 0.3a1?
Posted by: Christian | November 15, 2005 12:56 AM
Bla, nevermind me. I messed up Lightning and Sunbird.
Posted by: Christian | November 15, 2005 12:57 AM
No, your question is relevant, IMHO
Posted by: Olivier | November 15, 2005 2:34 AM
This build totally borks my storage.sbd: none of my events show up, not even the name of the month! Yesterday's (1104) build works fine.
Posted by: jj44 | November 15, 2005 8:56 AM
uh, that should have read 1114 build.
Posted by: jj44 | November 15, 2005 8:56 AM
jj44, There are some changes going on to the mozStorage interface, independent of Sunbird development. Hopefully things there should settle down and return to normal in a day or two. See http://blog.vlad1.com/archives/2005/11/14/78/
Posted by: Joey Minta | November 15, 2005 9:25 AM
I'm very interested in Lightning news, and looking forward to a testable beta (for thunderbird 1.5).
a few questions:
Just how much code do Sunbird, Lightning, and the Calender-extension share?
Once Lightning has a stable release build, will it replace the Calender-extension, or will all 3 variants live on independantly?
and Why isnt Lightning mentioned anywhere on http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/?
the only answers i can find are those hinted at on wikipedia:lightning
thanks for any feedback,
We're curious!
Posted by: nick | November 15, 2005 9:29 PM
Is there a tracker bug for the new version of sunbird or a tracker for the first version of lightning ??
Posted by: raymond | November 16, 2005 2:13 AM
Hi there,
Feel the same as Nick. Lightning should have more heads up as it isn't mentioned anywhere in the mozilla project page. There needs to be good trackers for knowing which builds work without crashing or something after 0.3 alpha or something so that guys like us can use it/play with it.
Posted by: shirish | November 16, 2005 4:41 AM
Nick,
> Just how much code do Sunbird, Lightning, and the Calender-extension share?
Sunbird, Lightning, and the Calendar-extension currently share all of the same back-end code. Sunbird and the Calendar-extension share almost everything. You'll notice however, substantial difference in the user-interface between current nightly builds of Lightning and Sunbird. One of the major goals of 0.3a2 is to reduce these differences, so that even more code will be shared.
>Once Lightning has a stable release build, will it replace the Calender-extension, or will all 3 variants
>live on independantly?
This is something that is still being decided.
>Why isnt Lightning mentioned anywhere on http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/?
Because there isn't much about it that's ready for the general public yet. Once there is a decent 0.1 release, then it might make sense to have more information readily available. The wiki page you found is indeed the best resource. You can also follow Dan's blog, as he tends to post some announcements regarding Lightning there.
Raymond,
The tracking bug for Lightning 0.1 is Bug 298366. However, there are also several dataloss bugs that need to be fixed before Lightning will be released. It's too early for a 0.3a2 tracking bug. There's simply way too much that needs to be done.
Shirish,
> Lightning should have more heads up as it isn't mentioned anywhere in the mozilla project page.
See the above reply to Nick regarding Lightning news. There isn't much point in telling the public about something that isn't ready for their use yet.
> There needs to be good trackers for knowing which builds work without crashing or something
> after 0.3 alpha or something so that guys like us
> can use it/play with it.
The only way we could possibly know this would be to put our nightly builds through a rigorous testing process that we simply don't have the resources to do. Sunbird 0.3a1 is designed to be as stable as it possibly could in the time we were given to release it. Nightly builds, by definition, are not as stable. Sunbird 0.3a2, when it's released, will also try to meet the same stability standard.
Posted by: Joey Minta | November 16, 2005 4:51 AM
@Joey,
the 1117 build is working fine with my old data.
Thanks.
Posted by: jj44 | November 17, 2005 10:02 AM