So it's been 11 days since I have used this (my main) computer. Mozilla is set by default to only hold things in history for 9 days. So now everything I had in my history is wiped out. I now have to completely rebuild my history in order to get the things I frequently auto-complete to do so again, which is quite annoying considering I'm used to only typing the first 3 characters or so of their URIs. Even more annoying than that, though, is the fact that I have no history for any of my 5 profiles!
Why oh why on earth do we have a date-based history? That basically forces people to use Mozilla every N days in order to have a history, rendering it all but useless for the occasional computer user. And for extreme power users, I wonder how large it can grow to. Would it not make more sense to store the last N things, ignoring the date?
Posted by caillon at September 11, 2003 4:40 PM<timeless> caillon: ok, i don't get it, your solution is so obvious, why in the world do we have the ui we have?
Have you filed an enhancement bug about this idea?
Posted by: Stefan at September 12, 2003 1:14 AMYou mean the current behaviour is by design? Good God.
Posted by: Simon Montagu at September 12, 2003 4:27 PMHow do you think it should work? "Remember the last [20000] visited pages" rather than "Remember visited pages for the last [9] days"?
Posted by: Jesse Ruderman at September 12, 2003 5:08 PMJesse, yeah that's what I said in my post. Though I think 20000 is a bit high. I would have said 1000 as a default (that's about 111 pages per day if you compare to our current default of 9 days, which should be satisfactory for most people, IMO).
Posted by: caillon at September 13, 2003 11:02 AMWhen I first read your post, I thought this was a great idea (URL count rather than time limit). However, after thinking about it a little more, that does leave a parallel problem to the one you had when you where away from your machine for more than 9 days.
If you do something that involves visiting a large number of sites, like browser testing or web development work, you might entirely fill up your history in one day with a large number of unimportant entries. I run into this problem with the Windows XP "Recent Documents" menu off the start menu. It's often full entirely of 15 image files or MP3 files from a much larger group I was working with - not very useful.
I still think you're on to something - but it's not obviously better, I don't think.
Posted by: Steven Garrity at September 13, 2003 7:49 PMhow about a combination.
instead of just counting the days absolutely, take in account last use date for the browser. Do not take into account the days you did not use the browser for the count.
It's as if the browser said, "oh you'll be away? ok go, I'll wait here.".
The UI could even remain the same. It would just behave smarter.
Don't forget, my friend, that you can change the 9 days to 90 if you want... It's a prefs choice, or did you forget? Of course, remembering 90 days worth of history would make an incredibly HUGE history.dat file, but I've known others who do it.
Posted by: jenkinsba at September 17, 2003 11:04 PMNot quite as entertaining as Shrek, but Dock animation can be an important and useful function in your application. For example, Dock animation is a helpful way to indicate the status of your application.
Posted by: Annanias at January 25, 2004 3:23 AMHelp! Did you include help tags in your applications? (I'd be lost without them.) Also, be sure to take extra time to develop your other help files. The Apple Help Viewer supports HTML, QuickTime, and also AppleScript. Take advantage of it! There isn't anything I hate more than going to the Help menu and finding there isn't any help.
Posted by: Thadeus at January 25, 2004 3:23 AMBut limit your animations to whatever is required to communicate the necessary information. Avoid annoying animations that discourage ease of use. Ask yourself, "What do I need to show the user, and what is the cleanest way possible to achieve that?" A good example is the Mail application for Mac OS X. Whenever a new message arrives, the Dock icon changes appearance to indicate a changed state.
Posted by: Sybil at January 25, 2004 3:23 AMBy building an application that takes advantage of Aqua's many facets, you help ensure that your application will not only look good, but have a chance of becoming a raging success. After a new user clicks on the icon of your program, the first thing he or she sees is the application interface. I know that when I review a product, I am very critical of its visual design. I usually have a short time to learn the new software, so design and ease of use are very important. Aside from those who marvel at the beauty of the command line, most users tend to react the same way.
Posted by: Pompey at January 25, 2004 3:24 AMTo help you become a good Aqua citizen, Apple has created a few guidelines. I've put together a brief overview of them, and we'll be tackling many of them in the months to come.
Posted by: Julius at January 25, 2004 3:24 AMThis is the first thing your users see, and probably the single most important visible part of your application. It is the first chance you have at making an impression and the best chance to help establish your brand.
Posted by: Ninion at January 25, 2004 3:24 AMThe simple fact is that, when all other factors are equal, where will consumers spend their money? I believe that in the long run, the best looking, easiest-to-use applications will also be the most successful. I think that's why Apple encourages developers to write programs that are 100 percent Aqua-compliant.
Posted by: Edith at January 25, 2004 3:24 AMAdhere to Window Models. Document windows, Utility windows, Click-through, Layering, Drawers, Controls. How do users open windows, how do you properly title windows?
Posted by: Judith at January 25, 2004 3:24 AMSo far in these articles, I have only dipped a toe or two into Aqua's pool. I have covered basic aspects of building an Aqua-compliant application, including the building of photo-illustrative/3D application icons. Now it's time to address other components of our Mac OS X application.
Posted by: Garret at January 25, 2004 3:24 AMAdopt Sheets. I really like the use of Sheets in OS X. The use of Sheets lets me know which window my dialogue belongs to without hijacking my system.
Posted by: Lawrence at January 25, 2004 3:25 AMI have always looked for a possibility to find information as quick as I can. Now there is the internet. And I really appreciate people like you who take their chance in such an excellent way to give an impression on certain topics. Thanks for having me here.
Casinos Online
Posted by: Casinos Online at February 13, 2004 4:58 AMWOW!!!! This is a great website.
business grants
Posted by: business grants at February 16, 2004 4:51 PM