See DevNews.
Posted by asa on December 8, 2006 12:24 PM
Wow... I didn't expect that so early.
Fx2.0 didn't impress me that much to be honest, but the things I see being put into 3 look like they'll be more than worth the wait from 1.5.
Posted by: ant | December 8, 2006 5:31 PM
Fx 2.0 is just as relevant as 3.0. People staying a version behind are just stubborn, ignorant or both.
Posted by: Omega X | December 8, 2006 6:34 PM
I thought the move to cocoa widgets was supposed to make it look like the rest of osx? They look more like widgets from os9.
Other than that it feels zippy and stable.
Posted by: jr | December 9, 2006 10:05 PM
I would like to try gran paradiso
Posted by: Mark Moore | January 9, 2007 11:43 AM
reactions, thoughts, comments, etc.
Wow... I didn't expect that so early.
Fx2.0 didn't impress me that much to be honest, but the things I see being put into 3 look like they'll be more than worth the wait from 1.5.
Posted by: ant | December 8, 2006 5:31 PM
Fx 2.0 is just as relevant as 3.0. People staying a version behind are just stubborn, ignorant or both.
Posted by: Omega X | December 8, 2006 6:34 PM
I thought the move to cocoa widgets was supposed to make it look like the rest of osx? They look more like widgets from os9.
Other than that it feels zippy and stable.
Posted by: jr | December 9, 2006 10:05 PM
I would like to try gran paradiso
Posted by: Mark Moore | January 9, 2007 11:43 AM