ajax catching up with y2k
In-browser AJAX replacements for desktop apps are getting better every day. Right now, I'd place the "state of the art" in web apps at a comparable level of commonplace rich client apps around 1999 or 2000. I've been playing with Ajax Write for about an hour now and it's not bad. It's not Word 2003, but it's certainly a step or two above notepad.
How far is this trend gonna go?
reactions, thoughts, comments, etc.
While it's not 'bad', it doesn't seem anything more than Midas connected to some back-end libraries to export to word/pdf/etc.
Again, cool and usefull, but I can't believe Michael Robertson is tooting this as a MS killer let alone even comparable. It's not even comparable to the first release of star office from years ago.
Did he mean to compare it to WordPad??
Posted by: Jed | March 23, 2006 8:49 PM
I think it is neat.
I'm not too web-savvy, but what I wanted to do was download the application to my desktop, and run it from there, albeit in the browser, but without necessarily being connected to the internet, and maybe look it's code (like you can with this little application --> http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/color-blend/ ). I found it difficult (in fact, in 1 minute of trying, I didn't succeed). I'm not uncomfortable running applications in the browser, but I'd like to have some clue about what is going on. Do I have to go to some web site every day just to download my word processor? Should I worry about what the program is doing? Could it be sending all that I write in the program somewhere without my understanding?
I cannot believe that their faq ignores those questions. Web applications are a totally obvious paradigm shift, even to computer novices.
I'd rather that it be easy to delineate between programs on the web, and programs residing on the computer, even if they use the web-browser.
Posted by: crf | March 23, 2006 9:24 PM
Yet another keyboard-inaccessible AJAX application. :-P
Posted by: minghong
|
March 23, 2006 10:32 PM
> Could it be sending all that I write in the program somewhere without my understanding?
Of course. If you load a document, it's actually uploaded to the server. If you safe a document, it has to be sent to the server again.
That's why I would prefer an offline version, too.
Posted by: Dao Gottwald | March 23, 2006 10:46 PM
Of course AJAX will continue along the same path as all previous technologies.
It will reach a point where it is *almost* usefull, *almost* feature complete, *almost* good enough, when it will be replaced by a complete rewrite in a new 'trendy' language/framework.
Give me a decient word processer in c, c++, Ada, anything! Hook it up to some web events. Hell, whats wrong with OOo + HTML export + ftp?
Oh, who knows.
At least all these technologies keep programmers employed ;-)
monk.e.boy
Posted by: monk.e.boy | March 24, 2006 1:36 AM
> Google Talk which, yes, communicates as plain-text
Then why not connect to their Jabber servers with something like Gaim which supports TLS?
Posted by: ant | March 24, 2006 8:04 AM
I'm not feeling to jazzed about the AJAX hotness at the moment, using a tempremental wifi connection in spain. Without constant high bandwidth services like Blogger have been a bit of a nightmare. I would like to be able to work offline until the last possible moment but none of these apps seem to enable anything like that.
Posted by: Gids | March 24, 2006 11:10 AM
OOPS! — Javascript Disabled or Missing
daarn it, it is enabled!
Posted by: goofcircle | March 24, 2006 2:41 PM
OOPS! — Javascript Disabled or Missing or I Are Stupid
asa, this trend is going about as far as this dang error message i keep getting.
also check out www.fckeditor.net/ no thats not a typoe
Posted by: goofcircle | March 24, 2006 2:45 PM
okay.. i went to 2.0a where everything is set default, and it worked.. it's pretty interesting after all!
http://207.67.194.7/apps/write/content/index.xul?doc=http://207.67.194.7/apps/write/welcome.html&user=&pass=?path=&user=&pass=&doc=http://app.ajaxwrite.com/apps/write/welcome.html
Posted by: goofcircle | March 24, 2006 2:49 PM
inconjunction with mozilla firefox's spellchecker you can drop wordpad, and micosort work, although I wish this could be downloaded so I can use it without a connectioN!!!!!!!
Posted by: trust | March 24, 2006 2:53 PM
I think Moore's Law also applies to programming languages: the processing power needed to get anything useful done doubles every 18 months. Compare BeOS to Windows XP, for example.
Posted by: ant | March 25, 2006 5:44 AM
The developers sound really arrogant, sort of like they're prophets or mind readers or something. That or they think people are idiots. The only people at the moment who know what an AJAX application is, is someone who has at least a little technical skill. They really make it sound like their average user has an IQ of 40.
"Google Office is vaporware meaning people talk about it, but it exists only in the press' imagination. People interested in a traditional office suite should absolutely try OpenOffice.org because it's a capable office suite available at no charge. But not even Google's engineers can turn the giant semi-truck like OpenOffice into a hybrid vehicle that can run over the net like ajaxWrite."
Its cool but I dont like the idea of using a web-based anything run by someone that won't disclose how my information's being used and sold.
Posted by: Frank Adams | March 26, 2006 5:14 PM
Hi,
Ajaxwrite just hung Firefox and I had to force close it. Luckily I have SessionSaver and all my open websites were restored for me, so I could continue where I left off.
Posted by: Bert | March 28, 2006 7:18 AM
Hi again,
I believe this hangup should not happen: When I click on Save with the example document open, Firefox just hangs. Maybe someone more skilled could investigate this.
Posted by: Bert | March 28, 2006 7:23 AM