We found a problem (thanks Martijn!!) in the first round of candidates and this new round of builds corrects that problem. Any help testing these new builds is greatly appreciated.
Posted by: minghong | April 3, 2005 12:27 PM
Does this build have the fix for the memory problem where FF does not release memory of closed tabs? Quite a crippling bug...glad to hear it was fixed, but no details of when it will be in build???
Posted by: Eddie | April 3, 2005 1:13 PM
Should i install this build over release candidate 1 or do a clean install of release candidate 2?
Posted by: xrayspex | April 3, 2005 1:36 PM
Hey, the file name of the installer is incorrect. It gives the version number as 2.0.3.
Posted by: Rishi M | April 3, 2005 1:36 PM
Excuse the double post, but the new 1.0.3RC installer created a startup registry entry. What for?
Posted by: Rishi M | April 3, 2005 1:46 PM
Rishi: That's a bug in the Firefox download manager, not a problem with the filename. See bug 231048.
Posted by: Gavin Sharp | April 3, 2005 1:59 PM
Rishi, i have no placed start up registry entry for FF afer installing this build.
Posted by: Xrayspex | April 3, 2005 2:01 PM
Hi Asa
This update works nicely, thanks.
PS I know this is out of place, but I was wondering if you could press to fix bug 202251. Basically, if you type an unaccented version of a word in the Find as you Type it doesn't highlight any accented versions. This is very annoying for those of us who are multilingual!
Posted by: poynting | April 3, 2005 2:09 PM
Hello, Asa!
There is a regression bug (287459) in 1.0.2, which has a patch waiting for approval 1.0.3, I've e-mailed to drivers yesterday, but I don't recieved any answers so I'll write here.
Thank you.
Posted by: ANBO Motohiko | April 3, 2005 2:51 PM
Oops, posted this in the wrong thread first.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050403 Firefox/1.0.3
OSX: Near as I can tell this is what's happening when I open FF 1.0.3, today's OSX build, then open new windows -- four, one after another.
FF Looks in 2 directories for a plugin, fails; each time it tries to download the plugin, fails; it stumbles over something that's been deprecated, then OSX tries to write a crash log and crashes the Console application (Firefox stays open).
Log:
/Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin: can't map file: /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/plugins/Default Plugin.plugin ((os/kern) invalid argument)
/Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin: can't map file: /Library/Internet Plug-Ins/MRJPlugin.plugin ((os/kern) invalid argument)
### MRJPlugin: getPluginBundle() here. ###
### MRJPlugin: CFBundleGetBundleWithIdentifier() succeeded. ###
### MRJPlugin: CFURLGetFSRef() succeeded. ###
*** loading the extensions datasource
/Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin: can't map file: /Library/Internet Plug-Ins/MRJPlugin.plugin ((os/kern) invalid argument)
### MRJPlugin: getPluginBundle() here. ###
### MRJPlugin: CFBundleGetBundleWithIdentifier() succeeded. ###
### MRJPlugin: CFURLGetFSRef() succeeded. ###
*** loading the extensions datasource
Apr 3 14:35:15 Hank /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin: *** Warning: ATSUMeasureText has been deprecated. Use ATSUGetUnjustifiedBounds instead. ***
Apr 3 14:35:19 Hank crashdump: Started writing crash report to: /Users/hank/Library/Logs/CrashReporter/Console.crash.log
Apr 3 14:35:20 Hank crashdump: Finished writing crash report to: /Users/hank/Library/Logs/CrashReporter/Console.crash.log
Posted by: Hank Roberts | April 3, 2005 2:56 PM
Thanks for the info, Gavin. :-)
Although Spybot S&D told me that a startup registry entry had been added for 'firefox.exe', the System Configuration Utility shows no such entry. That's odd.
Posted by: Rishi M | April 3, 2005 3:02 PM
Eddie: no, this won't have a fix for the memory issue - that'll be in 1.1. As far as I know, the installer bug leaving behind old versions in the uninstall list, and a couple of security issues, are all that's changed from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3 so far.
Posted by: michaell | April 3, 2005 3:04 PM
Copy and paste with OSX FF 1.0.3 (today's build) seem very messed up -- sometimes only the menu but not the mouse works; consistently it's possible to copy to an outside text file with the menus but not drag with the mouse; it's never possible to copy and paste from one Firefox tab or window to another for me with either mouse or menus.
I am able to pull down the About menu, hilight this, command-C, click here and command-V:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050403 Firefox/1.0.3
Posted by: Hank Roberts | April 3, 2005 4:54 PM
Not sure if this is just 1.0.3 or is a known bug, but
-- for links (hilighted and recognized by FF
-- within windows like this one: javascript:HaloScan('111219934082864627');
(which are used inside web pages, as here: http://preposterousuniverse.blogspot.com/2005_03_01_preposterousuniverse_archive.html#111155024666490546)
-- right click on a link and 'Open as new...' does nothing at all.
Posted by: Hank Roberts | April 3, 2005 7:40 PM
The links to the release notes (both in about: and in Firefox Help) point to the 1.0 notes instead of the 1.0.3 notes (which don't exist yet, but they point to the 1.0 URL). This is also a problem in 1.0.2, and probably 1.0.1. See bug 288864.
Posted by: Tom Hessman | April 3, 2005 11:20 PM
Heh :) I didn't know it was also checked into the Aviary build.
I only keep track of trunk builds. That swallows enough time already, and the Aviary builds are too boring for me anyway.
Posted by: Martijn | April 4, 2005 1:56 AM
Does prompt(); still return an error? It didn't in 1.0 and some extensions need it.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 4, 2005 5:02 AM
I have FF set to download all files to the Desktop, but when I go to download a file the Save As dialog always pops up instead of just saving the file to the Desktop.
Anyone else see this problem with FF 1.0.3 RC2 ?
Posted by: Defenestration | April 4, 2005 6:09 AM
I chose the FF 1.0.3 april 2nd aviary zip. I had been using versions of ff from 9.0 to most recently 1.0.2 posted march 30th, usually with no problems. I am using windows xp professional and had no problem with macromedia shockwave on any previous version, I do full unistalls and reinstall each item (flashplayer, shockwave, etc.) each time resulting with no problems.
But, with the FF 1.0.3 rc1 april 2nd aviary zip. I can't get shockwave to work in ff. I uninstalled it and reinstalled it and it will work in IE, but not ff. I saw some of the old bug posting for such problems, but I am not going to do anything manually to the registry, we shouldn't have to. Please repair this problem or post a work around that does not require messing with the registry.
Posted by: pillpusher | April 4, 2005 6:45 AM
Everything is still working fine .. no problems with the installation
Would using a profile backup utility be out of the testing scope for what we're doing here?
Posted by: John Blanton | April 4, 2005 9:11 AM
I found an answer to my question: this flaw is fixed.
Posted by: minghong | April 5, 2005 2:46 AM
pillpusher,
Use the MacroMedia Uninstaller packages available at (http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_14157) and/or full/manual registry search/delete! You may wish to use FlashBlock extension in the future!
Posted by: randombox2 | April 5, 2005 8:51 PM
Well this is weird, I've tried the last 3 Linux Aviary 1.0.3 tar.gz nightly builds. I always rename my old firefox browser folder so it untars it into a fresh folder (and I have a copy if something doesn't work.), and not one of the nightly builds will work using my current profile. They start up, but all I get are the browser buttons, and that's it. None of the menu commands work no web pages come up, nada. So, after I clicked on the X in the top right a number of times so I coukd get the Timed out error box to stop FF, I tried renaming my profile folder in .mozilla so FF 1.0.3 would have to create a new one.
Okay, I have a browser again (minus all my extensions). I then start re-installing the ones I use, and the first one I tried (If I remember right it was image zoom) caused the same problem when I restarted the browser. In fact, it didn't matter WHAT extension I tried. Delete profile, restart browser, it works, install an extension, browser dies.
If it helps, the last one I tried (before giving up and going back to the latest trunk branch ^_^) was: firefox-1.0.3.en-US.linux-i686.tar.gz 05-Apr-2005 21:01 7.9M .
Really weird, as previously I never had problems installing the Aviary builds.
Hope someone knows what's going on here?
Posted by: SantaFe | April 6, 2005 1:30 PM
HI
Testing Version 1.0.3. Clean Install. I am having an issue with Links. If i try To click on a link sometimes it works other times it Does not. Never know what will work. Links highlight as they should.
Posted by: Black knight | April 9, 2005 4:24 AM
Just Found my problem. It appears that the links are actually working, But the Popup Blocker is stopping them. Never had this issue with Older versions. the site s Question today is Dell outlet. Had issues with others, but Never thought to check the popup Blocker.
BK
Posted by: Black Knight | April 9, 2005 4:37 AM
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050410 Firefox/1.0.3
(I'm picking the latest daily out of the Nightly/Aviary 1.0.1 folder --- hoping that's the right place to look. I'm in a maze of twisty little links, and can't tell if they're all alike or not!)
It's odd -- slower than usual, still can't reliably copy and paste using command-C, command-V nor the menus. Can't drag a selection between Firefox windows at all, it's simply ignored (the previous selection is still in the buffer).
But I can copy and paste OR drag to a text file, and from that copy and paste or drag to a different Firefox window, reliably.
Posted by: Hank Roberts | April 11, 2005 5:42 AM
Oh, and this is why I'm confused about what Asa actually wants tested:
The link at the top of this thread, which people are asked to test, is:
So -- it's dated April 3.
Now, would that be the same as the April 10th build I found and am using?
What do you want tested?
Posted by: Hank Roberts | April 11, 2005 5:44 AM
What is exactly changed from 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 (besides the installer)?
P.S. Someone should update the roadmap as it is getting pretty outdated. :-P