Unlike the other closed source browsers, Firefox's reach extends when capable individuals decide to take action, not when some browser company decides it's worth their time to support an additional OS. See the latest Firefox port, Firefox for RISC OS (formerly Acorn Computers,) for an example.
Posted by asa at June 20, 2005 11:24 AMHmm, your point is?
Posted by: Johnnt the Baldy on June 20, 2005 12:33 PM@ Johnnt the Baldy: The point is that Firefox is the top choice for small platforms that need a top-quality browser! The little guys need good web communication more than anything else (they have few printed magazines and often live far away from each other), they often lack the resources to write their own web browser from the ground up and even if they could, who would support it? Enter Firefox: State-of-the-Art browsing, good market share (and growing), open source, active user community, lots of respect from eb designers and it's well suitable for porting.
So, say hello to the RISC OS guys!
What version of Firefox has been ported?
Posted by: Racer on June 20, 2005 01:29 PMJohnnt - just compare for example the closed-source browsers:
Microsoft Internet Explorer for Solaris - cancelled
Microsoft Internet Explorer for HP/UX - cancelled
Microsoft Internet Explorer for Mac OS X - cancelled
Netscape for Mac OS X - cancelled at version 7.2
Netscape for Linux - cancelled at version 7.2
Netscape for other non-Windows/IA-32 platforms - cancelled at versions 4.x-7.x
Opera for BeOS - cancelled
Opera for QNX - stalled at version 6.0 (cancelled?)
Opera for OS/2 - stalled at version 5.something (cancelled?)
And Firefox extends - Linux/IA-32, Mac OS X/PPC, Windows/IA-32 (three official Mozilla.org "tier-1" platforms), Solaris/IA-32, Solaris/sparc, OS/2, AIX, HP/UX, Mac OS X/IA-32, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD (9 operating system-vendor ports - by IBM, Sun, HP, Apple and the three *BSDs), and the four community ports: Windows/x86-64, Linux/PPC, BeOS and now RISC OS.
Only Opera is comparable to Firefox here (Win/IA-32, Linux on three hw platforms, Solaris on two hw platforms and FreeBSD), but it supports a smaller number of platforms (also, when you support Linux it's no big deal to port to *BSD or Solaris), and because of its closed-source nature, nobody but Opera can port it to $operating_system_of_your_choice. They won't do it if they don't see profit in it.
Posted by: marcoos on June 20, 2005 01:35 PMThis is great news, will have to dig out my old RISC OS machine and try it out.
Posted by: FP on June 20, 2005 01:41 PMThat won't run on any of the old RISC OS 3.x machines I had... :( oh well.
Posted by: ant on June 20, 2005 01:46 PMOpera supports a helluva lot more mobile platforms than Mozilla's offering, that's for sure.
Posted by: Rick on June 20, 2005 02:38 PMRick,
Oh yeah, and how many people do you know who use their mobile phone (or another mobile device - other than a laptop computer or a tablet PC) as their PRIMARY browsing machine/platform?
Also, what this shows is that programmers don't need to wait for Mozilla to make Firefox compatible with a certain platform. With the correct know-how, they can do it themselves. Why? Because of Firefox's open source nature.
Posted by: yfan on June 20, 2005 03:09 PMIn any case, there's the Minimo project to get a Gecko-based browser on mobile devices.
And how many browsers will run from a USB pen drive like Portable Firefox does?
Posted by: Neil T. on June 20, 2005 03:43 PMThis is the latest CVS version.
Posted by: Peter Naulls on June 20, 2005 03:55 PMmarcoos: To be fair, BeOS and OS/2 are, themselves, cancelled.
Posted by: Kelson on June 20, 2005 04:04 PMSounds hood, What is the defference on a regular firefox, a portable firefox and a zipped firefox?
Posted by: How on June 20, 2005 04:38 PMmarcoos, you are a genius. Thanks
Posted by: Anon on June 20, 2005 04:56 PMBetween installer Firefox and a zipped build, the only differences I know about are that a zipped build isn't going to make shortcuts for you on the desktop or program menu, and doesn't throw stuff in the Registry that plugin installers look for.
Portable Firefox, I'm not too sure. This maybe would help:
http://johnhaller.com/jh/mozilla/portable_firefox/
Hmmm, Asa, I think you mean "Unlike the other, closed source, browsers, Firefox's reach ..." not "Unlike the other closed source browsers, Firefox's reach ..." -- that is you are using "closed source" parenthetically to label the other browsers. Without the commas in there it sounds like you are talking about the set of closed-source browsers, of which 'Firefox' is one!
Posted by: Smylers on June 21, 2005 01:48 AMAsa, will you read this article: Opera: Firefox user figures 'inflated' from http://news.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020330,39204643,00.htm and comment on it?
Posted by: T26NOV.ragnarok on June 21, 2005 02:11 AM@Smylers - Where did you learn grammar? If you have a string of adjectives (such as other and closed source), you seperate them with commas but without a comma after the last one. For example, correct: "It is a bright, beautiful, sunny day." Not correct: "It is a bright, beautiful, sunny, day."
Asa's right ;)
Posted by: Ryan VanderMeulen on June 21, 2005 05:07 AMGah, I can't read at 8AM apparently. While your suggestion is still grammatically incorrect, I see your point and do agree that his could stand to be revised as well.
But getting back on topic, yay Firefox! :P
Posted by: Ryan VanderMeulen on June 21, 2005 05:09 AMRyan: My point is that "other" and "closed-source" are _not_ equivalent items in a list. (In your example you could swap the order of "bright", "beautiful", and "sunny" and it would still have the same meaning.) As it currently stands Asa is describing 'Firefox' as "closed source", which is wrong!
I presume what Asa means is "Unlike the other browsers, Firefox ..." and where the tag "closed source" is applied only to the "other" browsers. In that sense "closed source" is non-restrictive, so it needs to be set aside with a pair of commas -- one each at the beginning and end; they have nothing to do with list commas.
Yes, I know the grammar is still dodgy -- but this is only a blog! And picking grammar nits in blog entries just for the sake of it is not a worthwhile pastime -- in this case though I was just alarmed to find 'Firefox' being called "closed source"!
Posted by: Smylers on June 21, 2005 06:45 AMRe Kelson: BeOS and OS/2 are not cancelled, they just switched hands. BeOS is actively being developed by yellowTAB GmbH and is nowadays called Zeta. Similarly, OS/2 is currently being developed by Serenity Systems (with some parts still being developed by IBM). It too has a new name: eComStation.
Re Asa: I hate to rain on the parade, but most small ports are developed despite the Foundation and not due to its help. I've witnessed several cases where Foundation employees were blatant about the small ports being nothing but a waste of time and resources. One of them even expressed joy at the thought of how the upcoming Cairo transition may kill the small ports. Sad, but true.
If you want more details, you know my my email address.
Prog.
Posted by: Prognathous on June 21, 2005 07:47 AMhi. i tried to trackback your site with something i wrote about firefox in france and there's nothing in the window when i click trackback.
http://anina.typepad.com/anina/2005/06/got_firefox.html
i wanted fashionistas to know what firefox is since no body knows in fashion industry....
best,
anina
www.anina.net