I didn't get any developer feedback at npm.seamonkey, so I'm posting here in case I've got Mozilla developer readers that don't follow the newsgroups closely.
We're coming into the final stages of shipping the Firefox, Thunderbird, and XULRunner releases. Each of these releases will be following roughly the same schedule which is outlined in general terms below.
For each of our products, we've got three major cycles to complete. The first cycle, scheduled to wrap in the next week to ten days, is all about getting key developer-centric features stabilized and shipped. This release is based on Gecko 1.8b2 and is targeting extension developers, app developers, and web developers. It is intended as a early heads-up to the developer world about the last year of Gecko changes that make the current trunk builds quite different from what we shipped just five months ago as Firefox 1.0. It will also serve as a preview of the latest Toolkit and our first XULRunner preview. If there are changes that need to be a part this developer-focused release, changes that will impact extension, web, or application developers, we need those landed ASAP. This applies for all three products, Firefox, Thunderbird, and XULRunner. In order to avoid a lot of end users downloading this browser release, it will be publicized as the "Deer Park Developer Preview" rather than "Firefox" (Deer Park is the project codename for Firefox 1.1) and we're not going to be shouting loudly about end user features. The Thunderbird and XULRunner releases from this cycle will also be somewhat low-key and targeting the developer and testing community rather than the end user.
The second cycle is scheduled to conclude about five weeks after the Deer Park Developer Preview. That release will be based on Gecko 1.8b3 and should be feature complete for Firefox 1.1, Thunderbird 1.1, and XULRunner. We will be freezing localizable strings with this release (managed by exception) so that our L10n community can wrap up the bulk of their work before we branch. Also, for both Firefox and Thunderbird, it is imperative that we have the infrastructure to ship localized builds from our systems by the time we get to this release. Additional focus for this release will be to get any remaining Gecko feature work landed so that what we deliver to our testers and developer communities here will as closely as possible match what we ship in the final releases. I believe that we'll be advertising this browser release as the "Firefox General Preview", targeting all interested testers - from developers to end users. Thunderbird will have a more public preview here as well, and if we're ready for it, so will XULRunner.
The third cycle is all about getting branched for the final releases. After the General Preview, we will remain frozen on the trunk until we're sure that there are no remaining major problems surfaced by the Preview testing, and until we're sure that we're fully localizable and all risky bug fixes have landed. During this time, drivers will be looking for low-to-medium risk cleanup work for the Firefox 1.1, Thunderbird 1.1, and XULRunner feature sets. We intend to not be accepting any new features at this point. When we feel good about the state of things, we'll create the 1.8 branch (opening the trunk to Gecko 1.9 development) and shortly thereafter we will start delivering Release Candidate builds for Firefox. As we work through the Release Candidates, the fixes we'll be approving will be limited to spit and polish, and responding to any late-surfacing problems from the earlier candidate and preview releases. It's likely that once we're on the branch, our primary focus will be to ship Firefox 1.1, with XULRunner and then Thunderbird 1.1 following afterwards, as was the case with the 1.0 releases.

I'll be posting a more specific status for the current cycle sometime in the next day or two and hope to have regular follow-ups to that post so stay tuned to npm.seamonkey for updates.
Posted by asa at April 8, 2005 03:25 PMThe Firefox roadmap... now with gradients.
Posted by: Anon on April 8, 2005 04:03 PMAnon: Quite a sad attempt at humor there...
Thanks for posting this Asa, I am glad to see things are moving along smoothly. I personally don't follow the newsgroup, so this is cool to see :)
Posted by: Mike Ennen on April 8, 2005 07:15 PMMike: Quite a sad attempt of trying to dull down this world there...
Posted by: David Naylor on April 8, 2005 10:03 PMYou forgot the Firefox 2.0 Roadmap. :-P
Posted by: minghong on April 8, 2005 11:56 PMDo we see fixing wmode bugs?
(286430, 271441, 247280, 266933 and 267599)
Like I already asked in some other thread on npm.seamonkey, are there any plans to update the roadmap? (I mean with new dates etc, not the long-planned-but-never-happened big roadmap update)
Posted by: mvl on April 9, 2005 02:10 AM(1) what's XULRunner? ... and what does it do for Firefox?
(2) Any plans to update the firefox roadmap???
later, Richard
Posted by: Richard Martin on April 9, 2005 02:25 AMThe post on
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/netscape.public.mozilla.seamonkey
somehow never made it.
Simply not there.
Nor the one for 1.0.3 candidates.
Posted by: Peter van der Woude on April 9, 2005 05:09 AMRichard: http://wiki.mozilla.org/XUL:Xul_Runner
Peter: It was an HTML post and I don't think Google Groups likes those. Read it at Gmane instead: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.seamonkey/5182
Posted by: Alex Bishop on April 9, 2005 08:09 AMThanks Alex,
obviously I haven't been the only one seeing that url for the first time.
Posted by: Peter van der Woude on April 9, 2005 03:19 PMi think that in 1.1 that download *.part system should be changed.
it's very confusing for normal user, if he's downlding 4 files at one time and has 8 unusable files on destop. why? and if the download cancels, then the *.part is still there. they should be atleast hidden or something...
Posted by: mark on April 10, 2005 03:26 AMWhen will we be able to see Firefox and Thunderbird being built on XULRunner? I'd like to see them both using that instead of their own private code, so that they could share memory and such.
Posted by: bill on April 10, 2005 12:15 PMYes ! Good news to see XULRunner in the short RoadMap !
Do you think we cant expect a more performant memory and/or running performance ?
Not yet perhaps...
After that, a XUL Window Manager will be possible :D
Posted by: Ulmo on April 11, 2005 02:28 AMI forgot where I heard this, but it seems that version 1.1 will be SVG support added (but disabled). The current change to the SVG tracking bug seems to further support this (tor added blocking1.8b2).
I wonder if it is the right time to so as, as the SVG support is still incomplete (or it is already completed?).
Posted by: minghong on April 11, 2005 09:37 AMbug problem..
when deleting old bookmarks from dropdown list
you have to keep going back and start again to
delete 1 again. can you fix it so the list stays
down until you click elswhere on page..etc.
regards pete
Posted by: peter on April 13, 2005 08:34 AM