I've just published new roadmap diagrams for Firefox and SeaMonkey. If you see any errors in the artwork, please let me know. This one was a bit rushed and I may have made some mistakes.
Posted by asa at August 19, 2004 06:03 PMnit:
in the blurb you show dates as "10/11". this is ambiguous. looking at the diagram tells me that it's mm/dd format, which is different from the format that i'm used to dd/mm (austraila).
can i recommend that the dates in the text are changed to the same format as in the diagram -- "Oct 11" instead of 10/11.
Posted by: byron on August 19, 2004 07:10 PMAsa,
It might be nice to include the expected Mac OS X release date.
Posted by: Risc "Riscky" Abacus on August 19, 2004 07:42 PMUmmm... I mean include the Mac OS X release date for Firefox.
Posted by: Risc "Riscky" Abacus on August 19, 2004 07:44 PMOkay... one more time... I am, of course, referring to the image... for those who take quick glimpse at that graphic it appears no Mac OS X release will exist... and if they don't dig a little bit... of course no date has been set yet so I would be hard to actually place it...
Posted by: Risc "Riscky" Abacus on August 19, 2004 07:50 PM[OT]: What has Blake Ross' blog happed? If I visit www.blakeross.com (or www.blakeross.com/blog/), I can see only the left side and nothing works. I can't see any post.
I'm using Firefox with WindowsXP and I have tried to visit it with 3 diffent PC.
Riscky: I'm not sure a Mac OS X date has been set yet. Given that the lead developer is on vacation in November, and there's probably a few weeks of work to do, I'd guess it'll be at least a couple of months later.
Tammaso: Blake's blog has always been broken like that. You can get a list of articles at http://www.blakeross.com/archives/ , or just follow the links in from MozillaZine and elsewhere if you're looking for the recent Firefox stuff.
Posted by: michaell on August 20, 2004 02:59 AMThere is a small bug in the Firefox Roadmap Milestone Plan.
1.0PR Greenlane 8/2004 Bugs + - ? Bugs with higher complexity/risk, localization impact. See queries.
"Bugs" links to Firefox Milestone Firefox0.10, which does not exisits in Bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Firefox&target_milestone=Firefox0.10&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
You should use Firefox1.0beta instead or correct this in Bugzilla.
--Thomas
Could you please correct the links to the open bugs?
Posted by: Anonymous on August 20, 2004 08:50 AMI agree with byron - the dates should make sense to non-Americans. YYYY-MM-DD is the international standard; is very difficult to misinterpret; and puts the month before the date, keeping Uncle Sam happy.
Posted by: Greg K Nicholson on August 21, 2004 11:33 AMIn the summary of mozilla.org staff metting 2004-08-02 posted in the newsgroup netscape.public.mozilla.seamonkey it seems that Firefox is targeted for November, due to Ben's vacation, in this roadamap it is set to Oct 11, so what's goin' on? What is the real target for Firefox 1.0 final? I will be happy If you can make this clear, thanks!
Posted by: Metropolis on August 21, 2004 01:46 PM